...It is depressing to have to point out, yet again, that there is a distinction between having the legal right to say something & having the moral right not to be held accountable for what you say. Being asked to apologise for saying something unconscionable is not the same as being stripped of the legal right to say it. It’s really not very fucking complicated. Cry Free Speech in such contexts, you are demanding the right to speak any bilge you wish without apology or fear of comeback. You are demanding not legal rights but an end to debate about & criticism of what you say. When did bigotry get so needy? This assertive & idiotic failure to understand that juridical permissibility backed up by the state is not the horizon of politics or morality is absurdly resilient.)
...
Who, after all, could forget the monstrous erasure performed by Stalin on Trotsky, by putting a warning sticker on him & refusing to shelve him alongside The Gruffalo?
...
It is a strange, depraved morality that chooses relentless fidelity to racist texts over consideration of the day-to-day lives of children & others.
No. I cannot extract. I cannot asplain. I cannot sum up. I can only say "Go. Go and Read."
This post was originally posted on Dreamwidth. where there are
comments. Comment here or there as you prefer.
...
Who, after all, could forget the monstrous erasure performed by Stalin on Trotsky, by putting a warning sticker on him & refusing to shelve him alongside The Gruffalo?
...
It is a strange, depraved morality that chooses relentless fidelity to racist texts over consideration of the day-to-day lives of children & others.
No. I cannot extract. I cannot asplain. I cannot sum up. I can only say "Go. Go and Read."
This post was originally posted on Dreamwidth. where there are
no subject
Date: 2012-02-26 11:37 pm (UTC)Also, this has nothing to do with the post (which is awesome, as always) but it's driving me crazy trying to figure out what typeface he's using on that blog.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-27 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-27 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-27 06:50 am (UTC)The Tintin books were some of the earliest I ever read -- but in fact Tintin in the Congo wasn't available (nor was Tintin in the Land of the Soviets). And Le Lotus Bleu was only available in French. So, in fact, editors had already recognized that those three books were not really proper children's fiction -- and for damn good reasons too.
I don't see the problem with noting in a forward to the book that _Tintin in the Congo_ reflects racist attitudes and is not suitable for children. The fact that these were common Belgian attitudes of the time explains them (partially) but doesn't make them any more acceptable these days.